Sudden attack of nausea.finchman wrote:The first thing Theresa should do is sort her fucking wardrobe out,for a 60 year old woman to wear figure hugging dresses cut above the knee is ridiculous.
Who does she think she is.....Helen Mirren?
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
Sudden attack of nausea.finchman wrote:The first thing Theresa should do is sort her fucking wardrobe out,for a 60 year old woman to wear figure hugging dresses cut above the knee is ridiculous.
Who does she think she is.....Helen Mirren?
Of course.finchman wrote:The first thing Theresa should do is sort her fucking wardrobe out,for a 60 year old woman to wear figure hugging dresses cut above the knee is ridiculous.
Who does she think she is.....Helen Mirren?
finchman... the Gok Wan of talkforum.finchman wrote:The first thing Theresa should do is sort her fucking wardrobe out,for a 60 year old woman to wear figure hugging dresses cut above the knee is ridiculous.
Who does she think she is.....Helen Mirren?
Peter Stringfellow.The Tick wrote:finchman... the Gok Wan of talkforum.finchman wrote:The first thing Theresa should do is sort her fucking wardrobe out,for a 60 year old woman to wear figure hugging dresses cut above the knee is ridiculous.
Who does she think she is.....Helen Mirren?
"I will say it is great to have a woman in charge of the country. She's very sensible and I think that's a good thing at this point in time"Steve Hunt wrote:Big fan of Kate Bush but, I fear she must be losing her marbles:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-38144908
Insulting Bushie . That's a no-no. You'll have to answer to Bas the POTY,TOTY host for thatSteve Hunt wrote:Big fan of Kate Bush but, I fear she must be losing her marbles
and RantanAlcoholBrazil wrote:Insulting Bushie . That's a no-no. You'll have to answer to Bas the POTY,TOTY host for thatSteve Hunt wrote:Big fan of Kate Bush but, I fear she must be losing her marbles
Is it wrong to be rich & want good public services & a safety net for people less lucky in life than yourself? Being rich, selfish & completely self absorbed is worse, surely?finchman wrote:It doesnt jar half as much as when multi millionaire luvvies crack on they are socialist.
Find a way of sorting out the 'less lucky' from the bone idle and I will agree with you. But to put the 'less lucky' in one big pile is silly. As for socialists, they should practice what they preach.Ralph wrote:Is it wrong to be rich & want good public services & a safety net for people less lucky in life than yourself? Being rich, selfish & completely self absorbed is worse, surely?finchman wrote:It doesnt jar half as much as when multi millionaire luvvies crack on they are socialist.
And you think being socialist, or having left of centre views means you should just give all your money away if you win the lottery or write a succcesfull series of books about a bespectacled wizard?Zambo wrote:Find a way of sorting out the 'less lucky' from the bone idle and I will agree with you. But to put the 'less lucky' in one big pile is silly. As for socialists, they should practice what they preach.Ralph wrote:Is it wrong to be rich & want good public services & a safety net for people less lucky in life than yourself? Being rich, selfish & completely self absorbed is worse, surely?finchman wrote:It doesnt jar half as much as when multi millionaire luvvies crack on they are socialist.
Not all of it Ralph, they can keep enough to keep them off the streets, but in the main they should be distributing their wealth, otherwise they are just hypocrites. And after all all rich socialists have just been lucky haven't they.Ralph wrote:And you think being socialist, or having left of centre views means you should just give all your money away if you win the lottery or write a succcesfull series of books about a bespectacled wizard?Zambo wrote:Find a way of sorting out the 'less lucky' from the bone idle and I will agree with you. But to put the 'less lucky' in one big pile is silly. As for socialists, they should practice what they preach.Ralph wrote:Is it wrong to be rich & want good public services & a safety net for people less lucky in life than yourself? Being rich, selfish & completely self absorbed is worse, surely?finchman wrote:It doesnt jar half as much as when multi millionaire luvvies crack on they are socialist.
Zambo wrote:Not all of it Ralph, they can keep enough to keep them off the streets, but in the main they should be distributing their wealth, otherwise they are just hypocrites. And after all all rich socialists have just been lucky haven't they.Ralph wrote:And you think being socialist, or having left of centre views means you should just give all your money away if you win the lottery or write a succcesfull series of books about a bespectacled wizard?Zambo wrote:Find a way of sorting out the 'less lucky' from the bone idle and I will agree with you. But to put the 'less lucky' in one big pile is silly. As for socialists, they should practice what they preach.Ralph wrote:Is it wrong to be rich & want good public services & a safety net for people less lucky in life than yourself? Being rich, selfish & completely self absorbed is worse, surely?finchman wrote:It doesnt jar half as much as when multi millionaire luvvies crack on they are socialist.
I want centre-left politicians to win elections not have a revolution & the very wealthy to contribute a bit more to public services not just give all their money away.Zambo wrote:Socialist cork poppers who pretend to have virtues and moral beliefs are blatant hypocrites.
Will you be willing to give up your privileges and private property once the revolution happens?
Ralph wrote:I want centre-left politicians to win elections not have a revolution & the very wealthy to contribute a bit more to public services not just give all their money away.Zambo wrote:Socialist cork poppers who pretend to have virtues and moral beliefs are blatant hypocrites.
Will you be willing to give up your privileges and private property once the revolution happens?
When I win the lottery I'm not giving it all away.![]()