talkFORUM Archive

doesn't matter.

birdie wrote:According to a report I read all those unoccupied reserved seats were from York, which, it seems, was the first stop, and a spokesman for Virgin implied that passengers were at liberty to sit in them until York when the people who had reserved them would be boarding, so, unless the train conductor, or whatever they are called these days, was very bloody minded, no passenger should have been without summat to park their ar*e on. at least as far as York, where I suppose people would also disembark so,leaving empty seats.

Yeah but the seats vacated at York would be in a right state after those northerners had smeared their filthy backsides all over them.

Reg wrote:

birdie wrote:According to a report I read all those unoccupied reserved seats were from York, which, it seems, was the first stop, and a spokesman for Virgin implied that passengers were at liberty to sit in them until York when the people who had reserved them would be boarding, so, unless the train conductor, or whatever they are called these days, was very bloody minded, no passenger should have been without summat to park their ar*e on. at least as far as York, where I suppose people would also disembark so,leaving empty seats.

Yeah but the seats vacated at York would be in a right state after those northerners had smeared their filthy backsides all over them.

Northerners do know how to use lavvies ya know, but then, if a bearded twat parks himself outside of one preventing its use........

birdie wrote:

Reg wrote:

birdie wrote:According to a report I read all those unoccupied reserved seats were from York, which, it seems, was the first stop, and a spokesman for Virgin implied that passengers were at liberty to sit in them until York when the people who had reserved them would be boarding, so, unless the train conductor, or whatever they are called these days, was very bloody minded, no passenger should have been without summat to park their ar*e on. at least as far as York, where I suppose people would also disembark so,leaving empty seats.

Yeah but the seats vacated at York would be in a right state after those northerners had smeared their filthy backsides all over them.

Northerners do know how to use lavvies ya know, but then, if a bearded twat parks himself outside of one preventing its use........

I've lived up north and I know all about what goes on there.

Reg wrote:

birdie wrote:

Reg wrote:

birdie wrote:According to a report I read all those unoccupied reserved seats were from York, which, it seems, was the first stop, and a spokesman for Virgin implied that passengers were at liberty to sit in them until York when the people who had reserved them would be boarding, so, unless the train conductor, or whatever they are called these days, was very bloody minded, no passenger should have been without summat to park their ar*e on. at least as far as York, where I suppose people would also disembark so,leaving empty seats.

Yeah but the seats vacated at York would be in a right state after those northerners had smeared their filthy backsides all over them.

Northerners do know how to use lavvies ya know, but then, if a bearded twat parks himself outside of one preventing its use........

I've lived up north and I know all about what goes on there.

I lived in Hull until I got married so I think I may have just a wpteensy weensy idea too.

birdie wrote:

Reg wrote:

birdie wrote:

Reg wrote:

birdie wrote:According to a report I read all those unoccupied reserved seats were from York, which, it seems, was the first stop, and a spokesman for Virgin implied that passengers were at liberty to sit in them until York when the people who had reserved them would be boarding, so, unless the train conductor, or whatever they are called these days, was very bloody minded, no passenger should have been without summat to park their ar*e on. at least as far as York, where I suppose people would also disembark so,leaving empty seats.

Yeah but the seats vacated at York would be in a right state after those northerners had smeared their filthy backsides all over them.

Northerners do know how to use lavvies ya know, but then, if a bearded twat parks himself outside of one preventing its use........

I've lived up north and I know all about what goes on there.

I lived in Hull until I got married so I think I may have just a wpteensy weensy idea too.

Ever encounter a poster from here called Gene Hunt?

Reg wrote:

birdie wrote:

Reg wrote:

birdie wrote:

Reg wrote:

birdie wrote:According to a report I read all those unoccupied reserved seats were from York, which, it seems, was the first stop, and a spokesman for Virgin implied that passengers were at liberty to sit in them until York when the people who had reserved them would be boarding, so, unless the train conductor, or whatever they are called these days, was very bloody minded, no passenger should have been without summat to park their ar*e on. at least as far as York, where I suppose people would also disembark so,leaving empty seats.

Yeah but the seats vacated at York would be in a right state after those northerners had smeared their filthy backsides all over them.

Northerners do know how to use lavvies ya know, but then, if a bearded twat parks himself outside of one preventing its use........

I've lived up north and I know all about what goes on there.

I lived in Hull until I got married so I think I may have just a wpteensy weensy idea too.

Ever encounter a poster from here called Gene Hunt?

I'm taking you mean on the forum? Can't say I've had many dealings but the name registers a bell, I remember someone who used to be referred to as 'the landlord' he was from Hull and anywhere else in the country you care to mention, and SWL-Dexter has returned, he was from there I seem to remember.

Believe it or not, we don't have to use Madeley Street Baths on a Friday night anymore.

birdie wrote:

Reg wrote:

birdie wrote:

Reg wrote:

birdie wrote:

Reg wrote:

birdie wrote:According to a report I read all those unoccupied reserved seats were from York, which, it seems, was the first stop, and a spokesman for Virgin implied that passengers were at liberty to sit in them until York when the people who had reserved them would be boarding, so, unless the train conductor, or whatever they are called these days, was very bloody minded, no passenger should have been without summat to park their ar*e on. at least as far as York, where I suppose people would also disembark so,leaving empty seats.

Yeah but the seats vacated at York would be in a right state after those northerners had smeared their filthy backsides all over them.

Northerners do know how to use lavvies ya know, but then, if a bearded twat parks himself outside of one preventing its use........

I've lived up north and I know all about what goes on there.

I lived in Hull until I got married so I think I may have just a wpteensy weensy idea too.

Ever encounter a poster from here called Gene Hunt?

I'm taking you mean on the forum? Can't say I've had many dealings but the name registers a bell, I remember someone who used to be referred to as 'the landlord' he was from Hull and anywhere else in the country you care to mention, and SWL-Dexter has returned, he was from there I seem to remember.

Believe it or not, we don't have to use Madeley Street Baths on a Friday night anymore.

If you ran into Gene you'd need a bath afterwards, don't worry about that.

If you ran into some of the characters I've met in London you'd need more than just a bath, a good fumigate and depilatory wouldn't suffice

I do like auld Jezza, and how the horray-Henry ''socialist'' media want him out.

He'll never be PM, and I'll never vote Labour again I doubt whilst living in Jockland, I would seriously consider it if in England with him at the helm. Owen? Not a chance! Another chancer.

Hope Jezza wins the leadership battle by a landslide.

kev living in Scotland must be a fucking nightmare, your choice is appalling, a Labour lezzie,a tory fat lezzie or a Jimmy Crankie look a likey...

SNP are deluded with their out of UK in Europe nonsense, who the fuck can rational jocks vote for??

finchman wrote:SNP are deluded with their out of UK in Europe nonsense, who the fuck can rational jocks vote for??

Alan Brazil and the Pisstank Party with Darren Gough as foreign secretary dressed in a lycra bodysuit wearing a helmet.

Hillman avenger wrote:

beingsoblase wrote:So, in light of this how long will it be before a law is passed making it illegal to publish CCTV, unauthorized phone photos and video of politicians, in the interest of national security of course.

An extremely long time.

Why so sure? I'm also thinking of arsey coppers telling people its illegal to film them being twats at demos when I'm sure that's not the case
The higher ups don't like to be cunted by video evidence.

carcinogen wrote:

finchman wrote:SNP are deluded with their out of UK in Europe nonsense, who the fuck can rational jocks vote for??

Alan Brazil and the Pisstank Party with Darren Gough as foreign secretary dressed in a lycra bodysuit wearing a helmet.

To be fair Carc , that sound the best option in British politics at the moment

Im not a fan of Corbyn and definately not a fan of his politics. I actually believe Corbyn is a genuinely good man and sincere bloke although in my opinion he is very deluded. He definately is unlike alot of the other career corporate politicians who are very greedy and sinister.

However Ive always thought that the press coverage of Jeremy Corbyn has been deplorable

Jeremy Corbyn media coverage deliberately biased against him, British public believes

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 25031.html

Thing i like about Corbyn is despite me finding him a good decent bloke and a sincere man, is that he really rattles the mainstream corporate media and the establishment

This Labour leadership marathon continues to limp painfully on, think there's another couple of weeks to go. Interesting piece in today's Times by Alan Johnson who says that the Corbynistas have created a Marx, Lenin and Trotsky like cult that will ultimately destroy the Labour Party and all it's achieved over it's history. Said that a party with principles has little use unless it can use them in government to make a difference.

The only voice of reason I've read or listened to throughout this never ending fiasco since Corbyn came into power. Sadly, Johnson who seems the only potential moderate and unifier can only watch from the sidelines.

Lord Kinnock's now spoken out against Corbyn. Thinks he won't see another Labour government in his lifetime, he should be more worried that two generations younger probably won't either.

The Welsh Windbag appears to be right for once.

WE'RE ALRIGHT

Zippy wrote:The Welsh Windbag appears to be right for once.

WE'RE ALRIGHT

The slapheaded cunt knows there's the double whammy of Labour's slow death and Brexit so he and his family's dependence on the EU gravy train's probably grinding to a halt. The only advantage of Brexit from what I can see.

Kinnock the kiss of death to all he touches, Lost in 87 and 92, and another defeat to keep the tradition going. Bitter Ginger.

Kinnock - get in the sea.

Seems that he's trying to get credit for getting rid of Militant in the 1980s and reforming the Labour Party. Thought it was John Smith who reformed it and made it fit for purpose. Kinnokio and his family got on the EU gravy train and this bit of shameless corporatism flies in the face of what he says he achieved. From my understanding of the time, he was pretty left leaning himself and was still unelectable.

kancutlawns wrote:Seems that he's trying to get credit for getting rid of Militant in the 1980s and reforming the Labour Party. Thought it was John Smith who reformed it and made it fit for purpose. Kinnokio and his family got on the EU gravy train and this bit of shameless corporatism flies in the face of what he says he achieved. From my understanding of the time, he was pretty left leaning himself and was still unelectable.

No it was Kinnock. John Smith was much more a potential PM than Neil Kinnock - but after 1983 the priority was survival not winning elections. Same will be the case when genuine Labour supporters realise Team Corbyn are leading them down a complete dead end.

John Smith wouldn't have got near the job of leader if the Militant tendency had their way. Corbyn slagged off John Smith in public just the same as he has every other leader (until now). Corbyn's politics motivated far more by hatred of moderate Labour MPs than Tories. Always has been. Why it's so hypocritical for him demand loyalty now.

Ralph wrote:

kancutlawns wrote:Seems that he's trying to get credit for getting rid of Militant in the 1980s and reforming the Labour Party. Thought it was John Smith who reformed it and made it fit for purpose. Kinnokio and his family got on the EU gravy train and this bit of shameless corporatism flies in the face of what he says he achieved. From my understanding of the time, he was pretty left leaning himself and was still unelectable.

No it was Kinnock. John Smith was much more a potential PM than Neil Kinnock - but after 1983 the priority was survival not winning elections. Same will be the case when genuine Labour supporters realise Team Corbyn are leading them down a complete dead end.

John Smith wouldn't have got near the job of leader if the Militant tendency had their way. Corbyn slagged off John Smith in public just the same as he has every other leader (until now). Corbyn's politics motivated far more by hatred of moderate Labour MPs than Tories. Always has been. Why it's so hypocritical for him demand loyalty now.

Assuming Corbyn wins next week, how do you see things panning out for Labour, Ralph?

Steve Hunt wrote:

Ralph wrote:

kancutlawns wrote:Seems that he's trying to get credit for getting rid of Militant in the 1980s and reforming the Labour Party. Thought it was John Smith who reformed it and made it fit for purpose. Kinnokio and his family got on the EU gravy train and this bit of shameless corporatism flies in the face of what he says he achieved. From my understanding of the time, he was pretty left leaning himself and was still unelectable.

No it was Kinnock. John Smith was much more a potential PM than Neil Kinnock - but after 1983 the priority was survival not winning elections. Same will be the case when genuine Labour supporters realise Team Corbyn are leading them down a complete dead end.

John Smith wouldn't have got near the job of leader if the Militant tendency had their way. Corbyn slagged off John Smith in public just the same as he has every other leader (until now). Corbyn's politics motivated far more by hatred of moderate Labour MPs than Tories. Always has been. Why it's so hypocritical for him demand loyalty now.

Assuming Corbyn wins next week, how do you see things panning out for Labour, Ralph?

They'll stumble on with Corbyn in charge & my guess is there'll be an early election & Theresa May will win in a landslide.