talkFORUM Archive

finchman wrote:The first thing Theresa should do is sort her fucking wardrobe out,for a 60 year old woman to wear figure hugging dresses cut above the knee is ridiculous.
Who does she think she is.....Helen Mirren?

Sudden attack of nausea.

finchman wrote:The first thing Theresa should do is sort her fucking wardrobe out,for a 60 year old woman to wear figure hugging dresses cut above the knee is ridiculous.
Who does she think she is.....Helen Mirren?

Of course.
Vital.
And while we are at it, did anyone else also think that Cameron never chose shirts to suit his complexion?
Perhaps if that had been pointed out they wouldn't have won in 2015.

finchman wrote:The first thing Theresa should do is sort her fucking wardrobe out,for a 60 year old woman to wear figure hugging dresses cut above the knee is ridiculous.
Who does she think she is.....Helen Mirren?

finchman... the Gok Wan of talkforum.

The Tick wrote:

finchman wrote:The first thing Theresa should do is sort her fucking wardrobe out,for a 60 year old woman to wear figure hugging dresses cut above the knee is ridiculous.
Who does she think she is.....Helen Mirren?

finchman... the Gok Wan of talkforum.

Peter Stringfellow.

Big fan of Kate Bush but, I fear she must be losing her marbles:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-38144908

Steve Hunt wrote:Big fan of Kate Bush but, I fear she must be losing her marbles:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-38144908

"I will say it is great to have a woman in charge of the country. She's very sensible and I think that's a good thing at this point in time"

Profound.

That picture of The Bush must be 30 years old.

Steve Hunt wrote:Big fan of Kate Bush but, I fear she must be losing her marbles

Insulting Bushie . That's a no-no. You'll have to answer to Bas the POTY,TOTY host for that

AlcoholBrazil wrote:

Steve Hunt wrote:Big fan of Kate Bush but, I fear she must be losing her marbles

Insulting Bushie . That's a no-no. You'll have to answer to Bas the POTY,TOTY host for that

and Rantan

I always kinda assumed Kate was a Tory anyway so it's not really much of a surprise...

Jars a bit when creative types announce they support the Tories. Doesn't seem right. Like a banker backing the Greens.

It doesnt jar half as much as when multi millionaire luvvies crack on they are socialist.

finchman wrote:It doesnt jar half as much as when multi millionaire luvvies crack on they are socialist.

Is it wrong to be rich & want good public services & a safety net for people less lucky in life than yourself? Being rich, selfish & completely self absorbed is worse, surely?

Ralph wrote:

finchman wrote:It doesnt jar half as much as when multi millionaire luvvies crack on they are socialist.

Is it wrong to be rich & want good public services & a safety net for people less lucky in life than yourself? Being rich, selfish & completely self absorbed is worse, surely?

Find a way of sorting out the 'less lucky' from the bone idle and I will agree with you. But to put the 'less lucky' in one big pile is silly. As for socialists, they should practice what they preach.

Zambo wrote:

Ralph wrote:

finchman wrote:It doesnt jar half as much as when multi millionaire luvvies crack on they are socialist.

Is it wrong to be rich & want good public services & a safety net for people less lucky in life than yourself? Being rich, selfish & completely self absorbed is worse, surely?

Find a way of sorting out the 'less lucky' from the bone idle and I will agree with you. But to put the 'less lucky' in one big pile is silly. As for socialists, they should practice what they preach.

And you think being socialist, or having left of centre views means you should just give all your money away if you win the lottery or write a succcesfull series of books about a bespectacled wizard?

Ralph wrote:

Zambo wrote:

Ralph wrote:

finchman wrote:It doesnt jar half as much as when multi millionaire luvvies crack on they are socialist.

Is it wrong to be rich & want good public services & a safety net for people less lucky in life than yourself? Being rich, selfish & completely self absorbed is worse, surely?

Find a way of sorting out the 'less lucky' from the bone idle and I will agree with you. But to put the 'less lucky' in one big pile is silly. As for socialists, they should practice what they preach.

And you think being socialist, or having left of centre views means you should just give all your money away if you win the lottery or write a succcesfull series of books about a bespectacled wizard?

Not all of it Ralph, they can keep enough to keep them off the streets, but in the main they should be distributing their wealth, otherwise they are just hypocrites. And after all all rich socialists have just been lucky haven't they.

Zambo wrote:

Ralph wrote:

Zambo wrote:

Ralph wrote:

finchman wrote:It doesnt jar half as much as when multi millionaire luvvies crack on they are socialist.

Is it wrong to be rich & want good public services & a safety net for people less lucky in life than yourself? Being rich, selfish & completely self absorbed is worse, surely?

Find a way of sorting out the 'less lucky' from the bone idle and I will agree with you. But to put the 'less lucky' in one big pile is silly. As for socialists, they should practice what they preach.

And you think being socialist, or having left of centre views means you should just give all your money away if you win the lottery or write a succcesfull series of books about a bespectacled wizard?

Not all of it Ralph, they can keep enough to keep them off the streets, but in the main they should be distributing their wealth, otherwise they are just hypocrites. And after all all rich socialists have just been lucky haven't they.

How are they hypocrites? Your making up the rules. They'd only be hypocrites if they were advocating a system where nobody had any more money than they needed to keep them off the streets, except for themselves - and nobody is.

You can be rich & support well funded public services & realise not everybody is as fortunate/lucky as yourself. Not everyone with lots of money has to behave & think like Sir Philip Green.

Socialist cork poppers who pretend to have virtues and moral beliefs are blatant hypocrites.

Will you be willing to give up your privileges and private property once the revolution happens?

Zambo wrote:Socialist cork poppers who pretend to have virtues and moral beliefs are blatant hypocrites.

Will you be willing to give up your privileges and private property once the revolution happens?

I want centre-left politicians to win elections not have a revolution & the very wealthy to contribute a bit more to public services not just give all their money away.

When I win the lottery I'm not giving it all away.

Ralph wrote:

Zambo wrote:Socialist cork poppers who pretend to have virtues and moral beliefs are blatant hypocrites.

Will you be willing to give up your privileges and private property once the revolution happens?

I want centre-left politicians to win elections not have a revolution & the very wealthy to contribute a bit more to public services not just give all their money away.

When I win the lottery I'm not giving it all away.

When you do, I hope you remember your friends on here, dearest Ralph