Page 5 of 29

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:45 am
by Darkyboy
The Tick wrote:The only poor thing are your claims of proportionality.

I shall certainly have a nice day in the wonderful multi-cultural city that I live in. :D
If your multi-cultural city happens to be our capital, the London news is worth a look. Feel the multi-cultural enrichment.

http://www.lbc.co.uk/

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:47 am
by The Tick
Darkyboy wrote:
The Tick wrote:The only poor thing are your claims of proportionality.

I shall certainly have a nice day in the wonderful multi-cultural city that I live in. :D
If your multi-cultural city happens to be our capital, the London news is worth a look. Feel the multi-cultural enrichment.

http://www.lbc.co.uk/
The top story on the LBC site right now:

A London cabbie who considers himself a "British European" wound up Nigel Farage when he called the Ukip leader on LBC.


:D

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:56 am
by Darkyboy
The Tick wrote:
Darkyboy wrote:
The Tick wrote:The only poor thing are your claims of proportionality.

I shall certainly have a nice day in the wonderful multi-cultural city that I live in. :D
If your multi-cultural city happens to be our capital, the London news is worth a look. Feel the multi-cultural enrichment.

http://www.lbc.co.uk/
The top story on the LBC site right now:

A London cabbie who considers himself a "British European" wound up Nigel Farage when he called the Ukip leader on LBC.


:D
You managed to miss:

A man violently attacking 3 women
IS plot to kill Londoners
Sian Blake's partner charged with murder
Man jailed for 19 years for violent rampage
Man jailed for killing unborn child
Man pushed onto tracks

It's nice to know you are more concerned with the thoughts of a cabbie.

Stick to The Guardian, where they can tell you how wonderful you are for embracing multi-cultural values.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 12:04 pm
by The Tick
Right because crime is unique to London?

Things like that do happen, but it doesn't stop most people from leading their lives.

And what that has to do with multiculturalism only your paranoia can explain.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 12:19 pm
by Roy Twing
kancutlawns wrote:
Robert Heenan wrote:
The Tick wrote:The only poor thing are your claims of proportionality.

I shall certainly have a nice day in the wonderful multi-cultural city that I live in. :D
Can never agree with multicultural being wonderful though even myself finds Roy's tedious proportionality posts tedious and pathetic.
I admire your honesty and determined efforts to think outside the box Robert. Roy struggles to break out of the tired old cycle of bitterness, paranoia and false propoganda.
Got to hand it to Bob, - he certainly knows how to play the blinkered brigade.
From public enemy #1 to their darling in half a dozen posts.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 12:20 pm
by Roy Twing
The Tick wrote:The only poor thing are your claims of proportionality.

I shall certainly have a nice day in the wonderful multi-cultural city that I live in. :D
Just debunk those claims tick, - it ain't rocket science.

Put up or shut up, - there's a good apologist.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 12:30 pm
by The Tick
Roy Twing wrote:
The Tick wrote:The only poor thing are your claims of proportionality.

I shall certainly have a nice day in the wonderful multi-cultural city that I live in. :D
Just debunk those claims tick, - it ain't rocket science.

Put up or shut up, - there's a good apologist.
I and others debunk them as often as you repeat them.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 12:32 pm
by kancutlawns
:lol: He's cornered your market. You're just too archaic and stuck in a cycle of negative thinking to adjust. Take your blinkers off granddad.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 1:43 pm
by Robert Heenan
Roy

I agree there is a problem with regards to asian or rather muslim (as youd like to put it) grooming young girls.

I also agree there is a problem with regards to whites or rather christians (catholic church/Church of England)regarding paedophile abuse and cover-up

I also agree there is a problem with regards to whites or rather christians (establishment..Cyril Smith, Elm Guest house etc) regarding paedophile abuse and cover-up

Then theres this as well:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34219235

Then theres this:

Norwich paedophile abuse: Sadomasochistic women led child sex ring

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/norwich-paedop ... il-1521484

So please don't come out with this proportionality crap because its petty, pathetic and its tedious crap.

DSI used to try and use any excuse to attack christianity and thats where I took issues with him too.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:09 pm
by Darkyboy
The Tick wrote:Right because crime is unique to London?

Things like that do happen, but it doesn't stop most people from leading their lives.

And what that has to do with multiculturalism only your paranoia can explain.
So in other words you did not follow the link. It would have shown photos of the perpetrators. Then you might have seen the point I was making. Then again, with you, I doubt it.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:21 pm
by Roy Twing
The Tick wrote:
Roy Twing wrote:
The Tick wrote:The only poor thing are your claims of proportionality.

I shall certainly have a nice day in the wonderful multi-cultural city that I live in. :D
Just debunk those claims tick, - it ain't rocket science.

Put up or shut up, - there's a good apologist.
I and others debunk them as often as you repeat them.
Just one or two examples - just to refresh our memory, - that'd be nice.

Put up or shut up, there's a good apologist.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:32 pm
by The Tick
Darkyboy wrote:
The Tick wrote:Right because crime is unique to London?

Things like that do happen, but it doesn't stop most people from leading their lives.

And what that has to do with multiculturalism only your paranoia can explain.
So in other words you did not follow the link. It would have shown photos of the perpetrators. Then you might have seen the point I was making. Then again, with you, I doubt it.
What have photos of perpetrators got to do with anything? Crime happens in London, in Glasgow, in Belfast and Newcastle. And in many cities around the world.

How that can amount to a condemnation of multiculturalism is extremely doubtful.

London's a great place, with its share of problems. Overall it's given me a good life, and interacting with people of various backgrounds has contributed to that.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:49 pm
by The Tick
Roy Twing wrote:
The Tick wrote:
Roy Twing wrote:
The Tick wrote:The only poor thing are your claims of proportionality.

I shall certainly have a nice day in the wonderful multi-cultural city that I live in. :D
Just debunk those claims tick, - it ain't rocket science.

Put up or shut up, - there's a good apologist.
I and others debunk them as often as you repeat them.
Just one or two examples - just to refresh our memory, - that'd be nice.

Put up or shut up, there's a good apologist.
https://www.talkforum.co.uk/viewtopic.p ... ty#p734410

https://www.talkforum.co.uk/viewtopic.p ... &start=255

Where your "proportionality" claims are debunked.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:48 pm
by Roy Twing
The Tick wrote:
Roy Twing wrote:
The Tick wrote:
Roy Twing wrote:
The Tick wrote:The only poor thing are your claims of proportionality.

I shall certainly have a nice day in the wonderful multi-cultural city that I live in. :D
Just debunk those claims tick, - it ain't rocket science.

Put up or shut up, - there's a good apologist.
I and others debunk them as often as you repeat them.
Just one or two examples - just to refresh our memory, - that'd be nice.

Put up or shut up, there's a good apologist.
https://www.talkforum.co.uk/viewtopic.p ... ty#p734410

https://www.talkforum.co.uk/viewtopic.p ... &start=255

Where your "proportionality" claims are debunked.
Rather than meaningless links, please just show the actual argument where you have debunked my argument there's a good apologist.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:49 pm
by The Tick
The dialogues in the two links show the debunkings I refer to.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 6:12 pm
by Roy Twing
The Tick wrote:The dialogues in the two links show the debunkings I refer to.

The dialogues in the two links show the opposite of what you refer to.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 6:13 pm
by The Tick
They show you desperately pedaling the proportionality argument to no real effect.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 6:29 pm
by Roy Twing
The Tick wrote:They show you desperately pedaling the proportionality argument to no real effect.
"No real effect" - that sounds very much like backpeddling from 'debunking' to me.

Put up or shut up tick

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 6:31 pm
by The Tick
Yes no real effect, because it was debunked effectively.

You asked for two examples, and you got them.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 6:52 pm
by Roy Twing
The Tick wrote:Yes no real effect, because it was debunked effectively.

You asked for two examples, and you got them.

Oh, - I see why we're getting nowhere here - you are labouring under the notion that a bunch of like-minded apologists disagreeing with me regarding the proportionality issue of muslim incompatibility amounts to debunking.
Sorry to burst your bubble tick, but it doesn't.
Now, - put up or shut up.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 6:57 pm
by The Tick
You asked for two examples, and I gave them to you.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 7:07 pm
by Roy Twing
The Tick wrote:You asked for two examples, and I gave them to you.
As I said earlier tick, - your efforts today have been poor.
Come back when you can actually show where there is actual proof of debunking.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 7:08 pm
by The Tick
You asked fro two examples and I gave them to you.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 7:14 pm
by Roy Twing
Oh right, :roll: - well in identical vein, here are two examples of Elvis being alive and well:


http://www.talkforum.co.uk/viewtopic.ph ... 19#p867383

http://www.talkforum.co.uk/viewtopic.ph ... 19#p908694

Your efforts today have done you no favours tick, - I thought you were a better debater :roll:

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 10:41 am
by The Tick
You asked for two examples and you got them. Stop whining.