This is the talkFORUM archive where older posts come to have a rest.
https://archive1.talkforum.co.uk/
do you think barry and his gang were doing well, pushing putin?Hillman avenger wrote:Looks like you are as deluded as Trump is.
Putin is delighted to have such an incompetent in the White House, and his decision not to do a tit-for-tat is to play to Trump's considerable ego.
i thought i was supposed to be enigmatic, you daft old trollHillman avenger wrote:I know you think you are funny.
But you aren't.
In fact if anyone looks like they are pissed, it's you..most of your posts are illiterate.
As for what Obama is doing, I asked you a few days ago, what you think he should have done, to no reply.
The evidence of hacking is considerable and there's only Trump (surprise) questioning it.
The link to Wikileaks has also been established.
i think vlad has out played barry at every turncarcinogen wrote:Putin was hoping Hilary would win the US Election as he has been painting the US (especially Hillary) as the bogie man to his people because it bolsters his popular support.
In a sense, I actually think Obama has cunted Putin, because he's gambling on Putin not knowing what the fuck a Trump presidency is going to look like. So rather than expel the US diplomats and possibly force the hand of Trump, he'd rather just keep his cards close to his chest at see how things play out.
Actually, it'll be fascinating to watch how Putin presents the new POTUS to his popular base in mother Russia.
Does this idiot understand anything about Syria apart from what he saw on the Beeb?Hillman avenger wrote:So Putin has "outplayed" Obama has he?
He has given support to a dictator prepared to use barrel bombs and chemical weapons on his own people.
I am full of admiration.
It's s bit like the liberal left love in with IslamRalph wrote:This love in between the alt right & the ex KGB, authoritarian despot Putin, is the weirdest things to happen in 2016. Inevitable it will end badly.
But you always sought that education, and now you don't need it?Hillman avenger wrote:Nobody is in love with Islam.
And I don't need education from you about Syria. Or for that matter, anything else.
Seeing as how its been conclusively proved so called moderate anti Assad forces are the ones who used the chemical weapons I think you do!Hillman avenger wrote:Nobody is in love with Islam.
And I don't need education from you about Syria. Or for that matter, anything else.
not sure you're quite right there, myhillmanHillman avenger wrote:Where on earth do you get these ideas?
The UN investigated the use of sarin and identified it had come from Syrian army sources. Obama said they had "crossed the red line" and Russia told them to stop.
They didn't. They subsequently launched a series of chemical attacks, one of which killed 1400 civilians. The US was ready to destroy their chemical weapons stores but after we voted against action in Syria Congress followed.
Apart from that of course you are right.
I don't know where you and paolo get your information but you should get your money back. Someone is taking the piss.
Howabout hereHillman avenger wrote:Where on earth do you get these ideas?
It's been conclusively proved that (Putin backed) Assad used chemical weapons. So why such slavish support for him & Putin from some on the right?m4 colin wrote:Seeing as how its been conclusively proved so called moderate anti Assad forces are the ones who used the chemical weapons I think you do!Hillman avenger wrote:Nobody is in love with Islam.
And I don't need education from you about Syria. Or for that matter, anything else.
the chemical weapons accusations against Assad aren't that different to those used against saddam.Ralph wrote:It's been conclusively proved that (Putin backed) Assad used chemical weapons. So why such slavish support for him & Putin from some on the right?m4 colin wrote:Seeing as how its been conclusively proved so called moderate anti Assad forces are the ones who used the chemical weapons I think you do!Hillman avenger wrote:Nobody is in love with Islam.
And I don't need education from you about Syria. Or for that matter, anything else.
Seems if you support a load of fascist nutters you can do no wrong as far as the 'alt right' are concerned. Butchering your own people & murdering dissidents not a problem. The 'alt right' is a moral vacumn.
West'aThe Tick wrote:the chemical weapons accusations against Assad aren't that different to those used against saddam.Ralph wrote:It's been conclusively proved that (Putin backed) Assad used chemical weapons. So why such slavish support for him & Putin from some on the right?m4 colin wrote:Seeing as how its been conclusively proved so called moderate anti Assad forces are the ones who used the chemical weapons I think you do!Hillman avenger wrote:Nobody is in love with Islam.
And I don't need education from you about Syria. Or for that matter, anything else.
Seems if you support a load of fascist nutters you can do no wrong as far as the 'alt right' are concerned. Butchering your own people & murdering dissidents not a problem. The 'alt right' is a moral vacumn.
Just a ruse to justify intervention, regime change. Which will lead to the same chaos as Iraq and Libya. It's all crocodile tears. Otherwise where's the international drive to stop israels use of chemicals against the Palestinians.
It's all double standards and hollow bleating on the west'a part.
it hasn't been proved at allRalph wrote:It's been conclusively proved that (Putin backed) Assad used chemical weapons. So why such slavish support for him & Putin from some on the right?m4 colin wrote:Seeing as how its been conclusively proved so called moderate anti Assad forces are the ones who used the chemical weapons I think you do!Hillman avenger wrote:Nobody is in love with Islam.
And I don't need education from you about Syria. Or for that matter, anything else.
Seems if you support a load of fascist nutters you can do no wrong as far as the 'alt right' are concerned. Butchering your own people & murdering dissidents not a problem. The 'alt right' is a moral vacumn.