Petingo wrote:Roy Twing wrote:Ralph wrote:Petingo wrote:I must be missing sommat.
More people actually voted againd Trump than wot voted for him.
Brexit was gained with a very slim majority, and even at that, was endorsed by what, about 30 to 40% of the electorate.
Hardly a sign of a mass movement of lovahs of libertah on the march, innit
Contrary to the longings of some on the lunatic fringe in this here bailwick, progressive liberal values will not be trampled underfoot in perpetuity by demagogues peddling lies and innuendo and whom, when given their "victory", have not got the foggiest notion how to go forward, given their own lack of belief in their own lies.
Suddenly Obamacare doesn't need to be dismantled on day one.
The Mexican wall was merely a "good election device".
Watch this space, you guys.
The good guys are still here
Yep. More people voted for Hillary Clinton than Donald Trump. By the time all the votes have been counted it's possible she will have won the popular vote quite comfortably.
Points to a badly organised Clinton campaign more than anything else.
Sour grapes out in force again.
Trump won.
Brexit won.
Get over I.
What a silly man you are, Mr. Twing.
The reasons you put forward fir Brexit winning are the polar opposite of what you do for Trump winning,
Y'all can't have it both ways.
But that is by the by.
The OP is blathering on about the Trump victory being a sign that lovahs of libertah are on the march when in actual fact, an incontrovertible and inconvenient truth for him and his theory is that more people actually voted againt Trump than wot voted for him.
Now put that in your pipe and smoke it.
And try and pay attention to the topic under discussion.
Thank yiun
Perhaps if I adopt an affected southern drawl I may appear less 'silly' to those of your mindset Mr P.
Leaving aside personal jibes though if at all possible, as royals has already clarified, there is no contradiction.
The referendum was a straightforward , one-off, in or out vote, - brexit won under the rules of the vote, - there is no ambiguity.
The trump campaign won under the rules of the US electoral system, - as trump himself said, he played by those rules and campaigned where he felt it necessary, and if the result were based on total popular vote he "would have campaigned in N.Y. Florida and California and won even bigger and more easily" - in other words, he won under the rules of the vote - there is no ambiguity.
But carry on with the sour grapes, if you think it makes you feel better.