Do you trust the Mainstream Media?

[Royal24s]

Obama is about to hand control of the Internet to his bosses at the UN. In future China and Saudi Arabia will be deciding what we can see, so things will change in terms of unvensored news from that source.

What is very concerning is the case of Michael Savage, whose radio show was pulled from the air without notice the other evening. He insists that it was a deliberate sabotage of free speech because he was at the time discussing and criticising Killery . There is an alternative explanation from the network and a huge effort from left leaning media to support this rather more innocent version of events.
I must say that I can't get to the bottom of it at the moment. I do find it suspicious that theres such a whirlwind of what we might call aggressive denial from globalist spin outlets, but it's really not clear where the truth lies right now .
Depending upon what's really gone on, it could be a serious development.

[rorymac]

Another great random outburst there !

Ghost knows stuff Royals .. see all he had to say was 'tfi friday' !!!!!!!!!!!

No I don't is the short answer .. but I'm way happier when I know fuckall ! I think it leads to mental illness trying to keep up with all the various agendas to get to the truth. That's why I like big pictures and folks who talk about God and conspiracy theories. I fully believe that the earth is a globe but I've watched every thing there is on the internet about it being flat and contained within a firmament.

I like Jeremy Corbyn but I'm fucked if I'm going to listen to a political speech .. I believe in unions but every union person I ever met was a cunt. My favourite local MP happens to be a tory. I admire some actrivists but every one I ever met was a cunt.

I believe everyone over the age of 40 is mentally ill .. unfortunately 99% percent are wholly unaware of this and so I only believe in 1% of the population .. those who know !! they are insane and wear it well.

Ok ex atheists who have found God .. god fucking help and spare us from these guys ! Every one zero self awareness and a cunt. However I enjoy these folks too.

I especially despise the BBC end of.

When some humourless arsehole starts off on one about establishing boundaries .. go fuck yourself.

I believe in the sunlight of the spirit and following main stream media blocks that off and no mistake.

Aaaaand social media, internet forums turns us all fruitloop .. if folks realise that then it might be ok but without that awareness it's fucked. Ha ha ha ha !!!!!

Ghost KNOWS this Royals .. I beieve in Ghost

[Rossco]

Yes, my sources are the bbc and guardian

Smartarse

[carcinogen]

'Trust' is such a loaded term, almost infantile. Re-phrase this question and get back to us.

[Rossco]

Obama is about to hand control of the Internet to his bosses at the UN. In future China and Saudi Arabia will be deciding what we can see, so things will change in terms of unvensored news from that source.

What is very concerning is the case of Michael Savage, whose radio show was pulled from the air without notice the other evening. He insists that it was a deliberate sabotage of free speech because he was at the time discussing and criticising Killery . There is an alternative explanation from the network and a huge effort from left leaning media to support this rather more innocent version of events.
I must say that I can't get to the bottom of it at the moment. I do find it suspicious that theres such a whirlwind of what we might call aggressive denial from globalist spin outlets, but it's really not clear where the truth lies right now .
Depending upon what's really gone on, it could be a serious development.

The Globalists have been hinting and pushing for the Internet2 for a few years now. To much freedom of information on that thing ya know Freedom in providing real truth and knowledge and freedom in a lot of profit wise. Can't have that type of thing...no way. Although there is plenty of nonsense on the internet as well...not saying this site like

[Rossco]

'Trust' is such a loaded term, almost infantile. Re-phrase this question and get back to us.

That help? Although not 1000% sure if he said that or not. But wouldn't surprise me. Bunch of sneaky ballix the lot of them. And the mainstream media are a bunch of liars. IMO anyhow.

Who is the woman in your avatar BTW?

[Col1948]

I remember being on a forum one time and someone posted something from a certain newspaper, the reply was, "Don't believe anything you read in that rag."
Another reply was, "All newspapers are liars, I don't believe any of them," and others quoting what is the best paper to read and others disagreeing.
Then it went on the various news channels, again the same type of responses, so going off that how do we get to know anything and who do you believe or what to believe?

Have any of you seen certain MI5 type movies or serials where the editor of a newspaper has been approached and told either not to publish or what to publish in the paper, I know these a the more delicate top stories but I can believe that sort of thing goes on... Food for thought.

[henrycrs]

How do we know the "mainstream media" even exists?

Gaunty says it so it's got to be true

[Royal24s]

I remember being on a forum one time and someone posted something from a certain newspaper, the reply was, "Don't believe anything you read in that rag."
Another reply was, "All newspapers are liars, I don't believe any of them," and others quoting what is the best paper to read and others disagreeing.
Then it went on the various news channels, again the same type of responses, so going off that how do we get to know anything and who do you believe or what to believe?

Have any of you seen certain MI5 type movies or serials where the editor of a newspaper has been approached and told either not to publish or what to publish in the paper, I know these a the more delicate top stories but I can believe that sort of thing goes on... Food for thought.

That certainly happens. It happened when Tony Blairs daughter got so upset about him being a war criminal that she attempted suicide.
Usually though, it's s lot more subtle than that. From the point of view of the reporters presenters and correspondents it's a general culture where they know there are certain things they'd better not say and certain aims they'd better support if they'd like to keep their job or advance , but no one actually tells them that directly.
It's also a matter of recruitment - if you recruit people with left wing views on the whole you'll get these views reflected in output. Now, being left wing is not actually the aim or agenda of those who have gained control of the BBC and other media at great expense , but it works for them in the short and medium term because it promotes the bringing down of borders , benefit dependency , population movement and the break up of families.
When the time comes they intend to take down socialists and certain religions which they are currently using in short order.

[Hillman avenger]

So wide of the mark it's laughable.
Suggest you try listening to Craig Oliver on today's media show.
WAS head of news BBC, then became Cameron's PR man ( perhaps Cameron didn't know he was really a "leftie"?)
Listen to what he says about the treatment of the referendum, and in particular about the "£350m a week" stories being unchallenged. To be fair, they had been running for over a year, told by the ONS it was nowhere near true, and still they used it up to the vote.
Yes, that's right. Someone who knows what he's talking about accusing the BBC of letting Farage and co get away with lies.

[Royal24s]

Mandy Rice Davies, Hillman.

[Hillman avenger]

Mandy Rice Davies, Hillman.

Do you think that is some kind of wry comment?

You simply don't have a clue.

[Royal24s]

Why be so fucking rude ?
It baffled me why you do this crap every time you're stuck for an argument, and it doesn't convince anyone. You tell me that the BBC isn't biased because someone from the BBC says its not biased and that is plain ridiculous. Adding a bit of childish name calling doesn't make it any less so.

[henrycrs]

The BBC are the biggest load of lefty apologists going.

[m4rkb]

The Guardian's had a mare, literally.

One of their third party ads on the frontpage of their website had a woman sucking a donkeys cock.

No doubt it was correctly chosen for its target audience.

http://order-order.com/2016/11/08/woman ... ront-page/

You've got to laugh at the comments underneath as it was wuickly recognised as Poly Toynbee in a wig.

[Royal24s]

Actually, has anyone ever seen Poly Toynbee and Hillman in the same room ?

[Royal24s]

Terrible thought - Bates Motel in Liverpool. I'm seeing the whole thing now , rocking chair, wig and Polly's old clothes obtained from charity shops ! A darkened room and a black and white tv flickering in the background , connected to an old VHS video playing tapes of Tony Blair and endless re runs of the One Show.
Oh dear, I shouldn't have let that image develop - put it out of your mind !

[Royal24s]

Here

http://youtu.be/xWHYmNrAFlI

[Fug1]

I'm not a huge fan of traditional news outlets, I have had a mooch on the internet at various other media outlets, some were quite interesting, others were a steaming crock of Adrian Durham.

I suppose it's the nature of people to have an opinion on things.

I do think the World is on the verge of something very big and very nasty, will be interesting to see in which direction the Beeb etc attempt to lead it's listeners, viewers and readers.

[Rossco]

I'm not a huge fan of traditional news outlets, I have had a mooch on the internet at various other media outlets, some were quite interesting, others were a steaming crock of Adrian Durham.

I suppose it's the nature of people to have an opinion on things.

I do think the World is on the verge of something very big and very nasty, will be interesting to see in which direction the Beeb etc attempt to lead it's listeners, viewers and readers.

The energy is crazy.

Feel it big time last couple of days. Not sure if big and nasty though. I guess it is from your stand point how you view things.

Huge changes are coming that much I know. Open heart and open mind from me at this point.

[Basualdo]

Their prejudices are in the open . They always were, but before there was always some flimsy veneer of dubious deniability about it but over this presidential campaign they went so all in to pimp a fatally flawed and criminal candidate that even they realise they exposed themselves to much like a rat too far from a hole when confronted with a Jack Russell.
There'll be chages but nothing as far as honesty or balance just more twisted cloaks of sleekedness then business as usual.

[Rossco]

Hmmmm.

So after the mainstream news have been found out to be liars. Their sister owned companies are closing rank.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11 ... chy-blaze/

http://www.allenbwest.com/michaelcantre ... news-sites

How it seems to me anyhow. Could they make it any more obvious. And they just still don't get it o they that the more they push the more people will buck against them. Silly mindset these 'people' have.

[Royal24s]

There's a great opening for new media sources who are ethical, and I know people are discussing it.