This is the talkFORUM archive where older posts come to have a rest.
https://archive1.talkforum.co.uk/
Charming.Roger 1984 wrote:Yes it does. They're STORIESkancutlawns wrote:Does it really matter? Not sure why people aren't allowed to follow whatever news sources they want to without some sad case on an anonymous message board getting angry about it.Roger 1984 wrote:Thats what your news and sources are - STORIESZambo wrote:Here you are Rog, if you need spoon feeding here is the link. What is your answer?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-38143187
Lawns, I have no idea why Rog keeps mentioning The Sun, unless he reads the fucking rag. I don't think he reads any media news stories to be honest though, as all the shit he posts on here comes from cloud cuckoo land
Now FUCK OFF!
kancutlawns wrote:Mods, is abuse now acceptable on the forum?
Roger and out!Roger 1984 wrote:You're out of your depth. Go on - Fuck off!Zambo wrote:Timely intervention chaps, and made me realise it's time to depart this and the Castro threads. Should have gone long ago. What a fucking waste of time.
Just Assad to sort after that then. Dictators must be crushed.The Tick wrote:Only a matter of time before the jihadis surrender all of Aleppo to the sovereign government.
Europe are too weak to act without the USA. And drumpf doesn't give a damn about fighting Assad. Bad luck ZamboZambo wrote:Just Assad to sort after that then. Dictators must be crushed.The Tick wrote:Only a matter of time before the jihadis surrender all of Aleppo to the sovereign government.
So a price worth paying to keep a dictator in power then!? Assad couldn't give a shit that he is killing his own people.The Tick wrote:Europe are too weak to act without the USA. And drumpf doesn't give a damn about fighting Assad. Bad luck ZamboZambo wrote:Just Assad to sort after that then. Dictators must be crushed.The Tick wrote:Only a matter of time before the jihadis surrender all of Aleppo to the sovereign government.
Zambo wrote:Just Assad to sort after that then. Dictators must be crushed.The Tick wrote:Only a matter of time before the jihadis surrender all of Aleppo to the sovereign government.
Royal24s wrote:Zambo wrote:Just Assad to sort after that then. Dictators must be crushed.The Tick wrote:Only a matter of time before the jihadis surrender all of Aleppo to the sovereign government.
Why do you think it's our job to decide who's a dictator then go round removing them ?
I'm interested why you particularly single out Assad too. I can think of far worse individuals running countries .
Have you noticed that a lot of Mid East countries prefer that kind of a system, by the way ?
Some countries prefer an absolute monarchy, and some outright communism. Presumably they all regard their own systems as the best, so would they be entitled to come and remove our government and replace it with one of their preference as you appear to think that we are ?
Or should we perhaps consider returning to the principle of the Sovereignty of Nation States before things get any more out of hand ?
Two really bad mistakes there Royals. Which is disappointing for someone who's the dogs bollocks and knows everything about everything.Royal24s wrote:Zambo wrote:Just Assad to sort after that then. Dictators must be crushed.The Tick wrote:Only a matter of time before the jihadis surrender all of Aleppo to the sovereign government.
Why do you think it's our job to decide who's a dictator then go round removing them ?
I'm interested why you particularly single out Assad too. I can think of far worse individuals running countries .
Have you noticed that a lot of Mid East countries prefer that kind of a system, by the way ?
Some countries prefer an absolute monarchy, and some outright communism. Presumably they all regard their own systems as the best, so would they be entitled to come and remove our government and replace it with one of their preference as you appear to think that we are ?
Or should we perhaps consider returning to the principle of the Sovereignty of Nation States before things get any more out of hand ?
Zambo wrote:Two really bad mistakes there Royals. Which is disappointing for someone who's the dogs bollocks and knows everything about everything.Royal24s wrote:Zambo wrote:Just Assad to sort after that then. Dictators must be crushed.The Tick wrote:Only a matter of time before the jihadis surrender all of Aleppo to the sovereign government.
Why do you think it's our job to decide who's a dictator then go round removing them ?
I'm interested why you particularly single out Assad too. I can think of far worse individuals running countries .
Have you noticed that a lot of Mid East countries prefer that kind of a system, by the way ?
Some countries prefer an absolute monarchy, and some outright communism. Presumably they all regard their own systems as the best, so would they be entitled to come and remove our government and replace it with one of their preference as you appear to think that we are ?
Or should we perhaps consider returning to the principle of the Sovereignty of Nation States before things get any more out of hand ?
Who said it was our job?
Who singled out Assad?
Take your time to narrow down the risk of dropping another goolie.
Royal24s wrote:Zambo wrote:Two really bad mistakes there Royals. Which is disappointing for someone who's the dogs bollocks and knows everything about everything.Royal24s wrote:Zambo wrote:Just Assad to sort after that then. Dictators must be crushed.The Tick wrote:Only a matter of time before the jihadis surrender all of Aleppo to the sovereign government.
Why do you think it's our job to decide who's a dictator then go round removing them ?
I'm interested why you particularly single out Assad too. I can think of far worse individuals running countries .
Have you noticed that a lot of Mid East countries prefer that kind of a system, by the way ?
Some countries prefer an absolute monarchy, and some outright communism. Presumably they all regard their own systems as the best, so would they be entitled to come and remove our government and replace it with one of their preference as you appear to think that we are ?
Or should we perhaps consider returning to the principle of the Sovereignty of Nation States before things get any more out of hand ?
Who said it was our job?
Who singled out Assad?
Take your time to narrow down the risk of dropping another goolie.
Oh come on now , don't try to be clever with me because that'd be bringing a knife to a gunfight.
ditch the knife then
In reverse order, you said that Assad had to be removed, so it was you who singled out Assad- and since you're posting on a uk forum in a thread discussing the role of primarily the uk, as well as nato and the USA , it is reasonable to think that you were suggesting that it was our ,( collective and common ), job to achieve this apparently vital task.
all that proves is that you're crap at interpreting a straightforward post. If you want to make it up to try and score a few cheap points.then be my guest. For the record all dictaors should be wiped out, they are all scum. Can you think of a decent one since Salazar?
Is there anything in your post which suggests that anyone else should do this. Peru or Nigeria perhaps ? Is there anyone else capable of doing it? Anyone else interested in doing it ?
Having painted yourself into a corner by suggesting that you meant something other than what you very clearly said, would you kindly state who else you might think could and should remove Assad and how this could be done.
hire Clint Eastwood?
Wasn't a junior Constable actually, and I did manage to qualify in and practise Law after I retired. Can't be bothered to argue with you about it, but yes I certainly do have the impression that I'm a great deal more educated, experienced and intelligent than you - just so you know .Zambo wrote:Sorry Royals, but I just read your posts now for comedy value. The content is completely negated by your posting style, and head up your own arse, arrogant, I'm better than you, more educated, more intelligent attitude. And what is it all based on what? You reached the dizzy heights of junior constable.
My opinion on dictators, terrorists, supporters of both have been very clearly documented, together with the reasons for that. I'd read through your above post again. It's all joined together making it difficult to stay awake whilst going through, and after a couple of sentences you launch into utter gobbledegook and it stays like that until the end.
I can only assume that I can't make sense of it due to my poor education compared to yours, and a sheltered life believing everything I read in the Daily Mail.
Royal24s wrote:but yes I certainly do have the impression that I'm a great deal more educated, experienced and intelligent than you - just so you know .Zambo wrote:Sorry Royals, but I just read your posts now for comedy value. The content is completely negated by your posting style, and head up your own arse, arrogant, I'm better than you, more educated, more intelligent attitude. And what is it all based on what? You reached the dizzy heights of junior constable.
My opinion on dictators, terrorists, supporters of both have been very clearly documented, together with the reasons for that. I'd read through your above post again. It's all joined together making it difficult to stay awake whilst going through, and after a couple of sentences you launch into utter gobbledegook and it stays like that until the end.
I can only assume that I can't make sense of it due to my poor education compared to yours, and a sheltered life believing everything I read in the Daily Mail.
Not just me Royals, you dismiss everyone's opinion that doesn't match with yours in a patronising and superior way. Do you do that off the internet, or save it for those who you don't know and will never meet? I hope for your sake it's the latter.
No point in pursuing the matter because you're simply too bloody clever to learn anything from someone twice your age
You should have got your telegram from the Queen then round about September
Are you in your nineties? Not putting words in Zambo's mouth but I'm guessing he thinks that people who do law degrees are out of touch cunts who can't get proper jobs and want to be in a profession full of liars and con merchants.Royal24s wrote:Wasn't a junior Constable actually, and I did manage to qualify in and practise Law after I retired. Can't be bothered to argue with you about it, but yes I certainly do have the impression that I'm a great deal more educated, experienced and intelligent than you - just so you know .Zambo wrote:Sorry Royals, but I just read your posts now for comedy value. The content is completely negated by your posting style, and head up your own arse, arrogant, I'm better than you, more educated, more intelligent attitude. And what is it all based on what? You reached the dizzy heights of junior constable.
My opinion on dictators, terrorists, supporters of both have been very clearly documented, together with the reasons for that. I'd read through your above post again. It's all joined together making it difficult to stay awake whilst going through, and after a couple of sentences you launch into utter gobbledegook and it stays like that until the end.
I can only assume that I can't make sense of it due to my poor education compared to yours, and a sheltered life believing everything I read in the Daily Mail.
No point in pursuing the matter because you're simply too bloody clever to learn anything from someone twice your age . Good luck with your un moveable opinions and dogmatic conclusions about the world , because they are based on nothing, will never happen and wouldn't work if they did.
You remind me of an even more intellectually limited version of Jon Gaunt.