Another typical crime.

[Carlos J]

No ethnicity was mentioned

Not sure what you're referring to exactly, but the point I was trying simply to make was that the very first radio report I heard on this crime this morning (around 8ish) mentioned that the assailants were white men. I was surprised by this for the reasons repeatedly highlighted on this very thread. But it is true to say that every subsequent report omitted ethnicity - I would regard both instances as worthy of interest.

Still says white on the BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-ox ... e-37510257

[Rossco]

Well if the BBC is reporting that these sick people are white then I would believe that. And let us not forget truth in all this here sad story. The white race has quite a few sick folk in it as well.

But while we are speaking truth let this truth be said. If the attackers were of any other race bar the white race then the BBC would not mention what race the attackers were or even mention race in the story at all. That I believe most honest people could and would agree with.

And I think that is/was the point people are/were trying to make. But pussy footing about instead of just saying the truth. Never be ashamed to say or tell the truth.

For the truth shall set you free. And most of this world will hate you for it.

[Reg]

If the attackers were of any other race bar the white race then the BBC would not mention what race the attackers were or even mention race in the story at all.

I've heard the BBC mention the appearance of perpetrators who were non-white.

Sometimes they don't mention the appearance at all, but there might be other reasons for that. They might not have that information, or there might be no reason to mention it.

In situations where the perpetrators are at large, and it is therefore relevant, they often give a description, including skin colour or ethic appearance.

[Rossco]

If the attackers were of any other race bar the white race then the BBC would not mention what race the attackers were or even mention race in the story at all.

I've heard the BBC mention the appearance of perpetrators who were non-white.

Sometimes they don't mention the appearance at all, but there might be other reasons for that. They might not have that information, or there might be no reason to mention it.

In situations where the perpetrators are at large, and it is therefore relevant, they often give a description, including skin colour or ethic appearance.

Have you now?

Well TBH Reg I always find that it is skirted over. That has been my findings. But if you have seen this then I am not saying it isn't true.

I just haven't seen that is all.

[Reg]

ABBC3_SPOILER_SHOW

If the attackers were of any other race bar the white race then the BBC would not mention what race the attackers were or even mention race in the story at all.

I've heard the BBC mention the appearance of perpetrators who were non-white.

Sometimes they don't mention the appearance at all, but there might be other reasons for that. They might not have that information, or there might be no reason to mention it.

In situations where the perpetrators are at large, and it is therefore relevant, they often give a description, including skin colour or ethic appearance.

Have you now?

Well TBH Reg I always find that it is skirted over. That has been my findings. But if you have seen this then I am not saying it isn't true.

I just haven't seen that is all.

I'm talking about radio - don't watch TV news so can't comment on that.

[Rossco]

ABBC3_SPOILER_SHOW

If the attackers were of any other race bar the white race then the BBC would not mention what race the attackers were or even mention race in the story at all.

I've heard the BBC mention the appearance of perpetrators who were non-white.

Sometimes they don't mention the appearance at all, but there might be other reasons for that. They might not have that information, or there might be no reason to mention it.

In situations where the perpetrators are at large, and it is therefore relevant, they often give a description, including skin colour or ethic appearance.

Have you now?

Well TBH Reg I always find that it is skirted over. That has been my findings. But if you have seen this then I am not saying it isn't true.

I just haven't seen that is all.

I'm talking about radio - don't watch TV news so can't comment on that.

I was talking about print newspapers. Or their online versions. Not just the BBC. Pretty much all of them.

And switch Radio One off....what age are you!!

[Roy Twing]

No ethnicity was mentioned

Not sure what you're referring to exactly, but the point I was trying simply to make was that the very first radio report I heard on this crime this morning (around 8ish) mentioned that the assailants were white men. I was surprised by this for the reasons repeatedly highlighted on this very thread. But it is true to say that every subsequent report omitted ethnicity - I would regard both instances as worthy of interest.

Still says white on the BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-ox ... e-37510257

I think I made it clear that I was referring in this instance to radio reports during the course of the day, - it was just unusual (I know I keep repeating myself on this) to hear ethnicity being mentioned, and interesting that it was not repeated in later broadcasts.
That is all I was stating.

But now you bring it up, it is also interesting that the BBC are mentioning the white perpetrators on its website, - if only there were a means of monitoring the similarities (or not) of these reports.

[Royal24s]

Shall I just come out and say it ?
The BBC has a very racist policy against white people. With the exception of themselves they think all white people can be regarded as equally to blame for all the ills of the world and should all be punished . Greg Dykes said a few years back that the bbc was " disgustingly white", and that he intended to correct it. There is no other interpretation of that adjective but that he and they regard a particular race as discusting . Fortunately that's the white race, because if it were any other race it would not be acceptable .
Personally I've got more constructive things to do than whine about being the victim of racism, but people of my race certainly are in this country.

[Roy Twing]

Shall I just come out and say it ?
The BBC has a very racist policy against white people. With the exception of themselves they think all white people can be regarded as equally to blame for all the ills of the world and should all be punished . Greg Dykes said a few years back that the bbc was " disgustingly white", and that he intended to correct it. There is no other interpretation of that adjective but that he and they regard a particular race as discusting . Fortunately that's the white race, because if it were any other race it would not be acceptable .
Personally I've got more constructive things to do than whine about being the victim of racism, but people of my race certainly are in this country.

We certainly are - no doubt about that (been saying it for years but the champagne socialist voice has been far too loud), - whether it be the BBC (and other broadcasters), or the establishment mindset at large, which discriminates in all sorts ways, against the indigenous population, not least employment, or the much more serious fact that most violent racist crime is against white people (or at least the largest group of victims is white).

[Royal24s]

It'll probably be a good thing in the end. We're a clever people and we learn from things.
Of course we were victims of slavery, but learned from that instead of trying to get pity or advantage hundreds of years later.
The Jews learned from general disadvantage that they had to be clever, and I hope that we are doing that too.

[AlcoholBrazil]

Well if the BBC is reporting that these sick people are white then I would believe that. And let us not forget truth in all this here sad story. The white race has quite a few sick folk in it as well.

But usually they are contained within the Labour Party headquarters.

[Royal24s]

I recently posted the true nature of so called racism in another thread, but I don't think anyone caught on to it.
It is an idea, or concept rather than an actuality. It is not touchable or measurable, but is bought and sold as if it were .
This is not to say that wicked behaviour does not exist, or that it is sometimes or often motivated, partly or wholly, by antipathy toward another particular group - perhaps a racial group. However, this has been the case since the dawn of time and it is only quite recently in history that it has been iscolated from other motivations, given a name, then used to manipulate people and make money.
For a very long time it was used to vilify black people and sideline moral objections to stealing their land and enslaving them. The current version is used to vilify white people for the events of the past and current thought patterns which the manipulators allege they have, and this again sidelines objections to stealing their land and enslaving them , ( albeit in a different and more subtle way).
There is very good profit and business to be had at all levels selling the concept of racism, but the big purpose is the old one of " divide and rule". By making it , in the public mind,the most serious and heinous crime in the world, it creates also a culture where absolutely anything which the manipulator wishes to do - no matter how draconian or tyrranical- is justified if its dressed up to be a measure to stop racism.

The irony of this , of course, is that insofar as it exists , we wouldn't be able to stop it anyway , since it is a part - perhaps an unfortunate one in many ways-of human behaviour to be tribal .
The more logical remedy to wicked behaviour of course is to address the actual behaviour itself rather than attempt to travel back a stage from it and try to read the mind of the culprit and attribute some politically advantageous motivation for it which is bound, if anything to fan the flames of this tribal instinct.
I find it regrettable that , despite attempts at universal public education , people still cannot see through this simple ruse.

[ovechkin8]

I've been threatened with a knife three times. And backed off. No point getting killed.

You have to make judgements about the people you see indulging in antisocial behaviour. Asking someone to pick up a piece of litter can often get you a litany of abuse or worse. The fault at it's root cause is poor parenting and then ineffectual punishments for miscreants who usually comprise a very small minority of repeat offenders.

[m4rkb]

There as a bit of an argument a couple of pages back about the BBC and other like-minded media outlets doing their best not to mention ethnicity in their reports. It's somewhat backfired as all it's doneis whine alight on it and create suspicion. You can usually read the comments at the bottom of every reports (bar the BBC as they don't have a comments section) and someone is asking for a description. the point being there should be one and if not it's conspicuous in its absence.

The point of the thread is to highlight the now unassailable fact that some crimes do not need a description. They can safely be omitted. We can literally tell from ridiculous levels of violence and location that ethnicity is involved. We do not need a description of who's involved in a gang attack in Lewisham where someone is stabbed 10 times and left for dead. Nor for a drive by shooting in other ghettos up and down the country.

The Police may be struggling for a motive behind a gunman shouting Allahu Akbar ('God is Great in Arabic' as it's now called) while mowing down as many people as possible in a packed shopping mall, but they seem to be the only ones struggling for a link apart from the complicit media - and these people are the detectives.

Total guesswork in the absence of any facts is most welcome on this thread simply because we know the rest of the story just from hearing a few initial details. In fact even the usual hand wringers know it as well which is why none of them frequent the thread. A definite case of QED.

Typical white British crime seems to centre around drunkenness, antisocial and yobbish behaviour plus a few other traditionals of course but it hasn't yet descended in to what we get almost every single day from the savage black community who have trademarked it and on many occasions seem proud of it.

Certain crimes are now the modus operandi of specific racial groups and the liberals in denial will carry on pretending. They are probably delighted that Eastern European whites can now be palmed off as white Brits in some crimes but that cat won't stay in the bag too much longer as we tally the initial reports up the eventual truth.

I'll go on listing them one after the other because although the point is now well proven, putting it to bed just takes us back to that state of denial we were in before.

[Hillman avenger]

Like every other media outlet the BBC relies on police releases and if its relevant will include ethnicity
I have heard descriptions including black white and Asian on both radio and tv

[m4rkb]

Like every other media outlet the BBC relies on police releases and if its relevant will include ethnicity
I have heard descriptions including black white and Asian on both radio and tv

The point being racial identity isn't worth mentioning in some cases is it. Not nowadays any way. Twelve people in gang knife murder in south London has come to speak for itself. Agreed or not?

[Hillman avenger]

There as a bit of an argument a couple of pages back about the BBC and other like-minded media outlets doing their best not to mention ethnicity in their reports. It's somewhat backfired as all it's doneis whine alight on it and create suspicion. You can usually read the comments at the bottom of every reports (bar the BBC as they don't have a comments section) and someone is asking for a description. the point being there should be one and if not it's conspicuous in its absence.

The BBC does have a comments section.

The point of the thread is to highlight the now unassailable fact that some crimes do not need a description. They can safely be omitted. We can literally tell from ridiculous levels of violence and location that ethnicity is involved. We do not need a description of who's involved in a gang attack in Lewisham where someone is stabbed 10 times and left for dead. Nor for a drive by shooting in other ghettos up and down the country.

The Police may be struggling for a motive behind a gunman shouting Allahu Akbar ('God is Great in Arabic' as it's now called) while mowing down as many people as possible in a packed shopping mall, but they seem to be the only ones struggling for a link apart from the complicit media - and these people are the detectives.

Total guesswork in the absence of any facts is most welcome on this thread simply because we know the rest of the story just from hearing a few initial details. In fact even the usual hand wringers know it as well which is why none of them frequent the thread. A definite case of QED.

Typical white British crime seems to centre around drunkenness, antisocial and yobbish behaviour plus a few other traditionals of course but it hasn't yet descended in to what we get almost every single day from the savage black community who have trademarked it and on many occasions seem proud of it.

So whites commit the laddish crimes but the real evil is down to blacks,..are you joking?

Certain crimes are now the modus operandi of specific racial groups and the liberals in denial will carry on pretending. They are probably delighted that Eastern European whites can now be palmed off as white Brits in some crimes but that cat won't stay in the bag too much longer as we tally the initial reports up the eventual truth.

I'll go on listing them one after the other because although the point is now well proven, putting it to bed just takes us back to that state of denial we were in before.

I

[Royal24s]

That's even harder to understand than usual Hillman. This time you didn't even highlight the
" interruptions".
I'll just take a guess that you're trying to say everyone is imagining this problem , just like they're imagining every other malfeasance or cock up by the State , the Labour Party or the BBC .

[Roy Twing]

No info on this one - any bets?:

http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/8203 ... story.html

[Roy Twing]

Violent crime up by 25% this year.
No doubt the fault of lazy brits, eh tick?

[m4rkb]

Police stepping up patrols due in my town due to 4 knifings and 1 shooting in 24 hours. Pprobably a normal afternoon in some parts of London

I expect The burglars will have a field day in certain areas where there will be no policing at all as resources are diverted away.

I wonder if there is a point people will say enough is enough and demand drastic action on these increasingly violent, lawless and utterly unemployable gangs?

Chances are honest people will have to stump up increasing amounts to pay for their free lifestyles, continued breeding, and ever increasing amount of do gooders claiming to represent them. We're already being milked for the cost of security regarding Islamic terrorism to the point of asking the perfectly valid question how much is their net contribution after all these costs have been taken into consideration.

[theleader82]

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2025632/k ... buse-ring/