Share of vote

A place to discuss the shambles that is the UK General Election 2015 - free and open discussion for all!!
Post Reply
User avatar
Hillman avenger
Registered user
Posts: 4586
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: north and south

Share of vote

Post by Hillman avenger »

Remember all the fuss about how the two-party dominance had finished?

Tory and Labour combined share of the vote was about 1% higher than in 2010.
Listen to Talksport and let it be a lesson to you

User avatar
chelseachelsea
Registered user
Posts: 1383
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 7:06 pm
Location: London

Re: Share of vote

Post by chelseachelsea »

Hillman avenger wrote:Remember all the fuss about how the two-party dominance had finished?

Tory and Labour combined share of the vote was about 1% higher than in 2010.

I think you will find the Conservative vote was considerably higher, to compensate for the Labour vote being considerably lower.

User avatar
the rotary club
Registered user
Posts: 3722
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:59 pm

Re: Share of vote

Post by the rotary club »

Nah that's not what happened ,both parties got more votes and an increased share of the vote in 2015.

Labour were butt fucked by the Jocks but this was outweighed by the increase of their share of the vote in England.

But as UKIP are finding out it's bums on seats that actually count not share of the vote.
Roger Dodger, you ol' codger.

User avatar
Hillman avenger
Registered user
Posts: 4586
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: north and south

Re: Share of vote

Post by Hillman avenger »

Nonetheless they are whinging about the relationship between share of the vote and seats.

In which case the fact that the two parties they aimed at increased their share of voters, so they have not made the inroads they claimed they would
Listen to Talksport and let it be a lesson to you

User avatar
colinthewarriormonkey
Registered user
Posts: 7042
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:57 pm

Re: Share of vote

Post by colinthewarriormonkey »

Hillman avenger wrote:Nonetheless they are whinging about the relationship between share of the vote and seats.

In which case the fact that the two parties they aimed at increased their share of voters, so they have not made the inroads they claimed they would
Fucking hell....this is desperate studff.

The reason the main 2 increased their share of the vote was because Labour got ousted in Scotland, and the same thing happened to the Liberal Democrats in England.

UKIP went from 3% of the share of the vote to 13% share

To say they didn't make any inroads is beyond pathetic and into the realms of the bizarre, there are ostriches with their arses in the air that are more aware of what's going on around them.
"The Cunt's Cunt."

"One desperate shithouse"

User avatar
the rotary club
Registered user
Posts: 3722
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:59 pm

Re: Share of vote

Post by the rotary club »

Fucking hell, this is desperate stuff.

The reason the main 2 increased their share of the vote was because Labour got ousted in Scotland - WTF?

As for your kippers :-

The SNP stood in 59 constituencies and got circa 25k votes in each - a great success & 50 odd MPs

UKIP stood in 600+ constituencies and got circa 6k votes in each - an abject failure & 1 MP.

Summat about ostriches.
Roger Dodger, you ol' codger.

User avatar
Ralph
Forum Admin
Posts: 5506
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 1:42 pm

Re: Share of vote

Post by Ralph »

the rotary club wrote:Fucking hell, this is desperate stuff.

The reason the main 2 increased their share of the vote was because Labour got ousted in Scotland - WTF?
:?

If they hadn't been ousted in Scotland their vote share would have increased more than it did.

User avatar
Roy Twing
Registered user
Posts: 5403
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:20 pm
Location: 51 23 46 N 0 11 56 W

Re: Share of vote

Post by Roy Twing »

Ralph wrote:
the rotary club wrote:Fucking hell, this is desperate stuff.

The reason the main 2 increased their share of the vote was because Labour got ousted in Scotland - WTF?
:?

If they hadn't been ousted in Scotland their vote share would have increased more than it did.
The only party to substantially lose its share of the vote (along with ‘minor’ losers such as respect :lol: & TUSC :wink: whatever that is) was the Libdems, losing over 15%. Labour gained a pathetic 1.5% of the libdems’ misfortune, - guess which party gained the most?
E & OE

User avatar
the rotary club
Registered user
Posts: 3722
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:59 pm

Re: Share of vote

Post by the rotary club »

The BNP went from 500,000+ in 2010 to about 1500. I wonder which party that half million voted for?

Labour's vote share up a very healthy 3.6% in England substantially more than the Tories gain.

Oh and 'the people's army' 'success' was replicated in the local elections where they only took a couple of hundred seats out the seven or eight thousand available.
Roger Dodger, you ol' codger.

User avatar
Roy Twing
Registered user
Posts: 5403
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:20 pm
Location: 51 23 46 N 0 11 56 W

Re: Share of vote

Post by Roy Twing »

You carry on thinking that RC if it makes the pain of last week any easier.
E & OE

User avatar
the rotary club
Registered user
Posts: 3722
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:59 pm

Re: Share of vote

Post by the rotary club »

Them's the FACTS Twanger, a concept you've always struggled with!

HTH :D
Roger Dodger, you ol' codger.

User avatar
Roy Twing
Registered user
Posts: 5403
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:20 pm
Location: 51 23 46 N 0 11 56 W

Re: Share of vote

Post by Roy Twing »

the rotary club wrote:Them's the FACTS Twanger, a concept you've always struggled with!

HTH :D

Them's the 'facts' arsey, as interpreted by those looking for comfort after the disaster of a few days ago.

Chin up, - only another 5 years of tory government :lol:

Did I read correctly that you've supported the TUSC party (whatever that is) in the past? How did they do? :wink:
E & OE

User avatar
the rotary club
Registered user
Posts: 3722
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:59 pm

Re: Share of vote

Post by the rotary club »

As I said you do struggle with FACTS Twanger, the above being a classic example.

Thirty sixth consecutive year of a centre right government actually.

Paul, the TUSC candidate I voted for in 2005 (?) lost his deposit. He still comes in the pub.
Roger Dodger, you ol' codger.

Post Reply