talkFORUM Archive

With just 100 days to May 7th & new polls coming out on a daily basis, might as well start this thread.

Latest set of polls don't look too bad for the Tories (amazingly).

Interesting article here on the parallels between now & 1974: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30756604
I do agree with Hillman in that I think we will have two general elections this year.

sadly, they will put more effort into bashing each other than showing their own policies?

what will be different from the previous 20 years?

they will unify against ukip, with scandals, phone taps, desertions, scare mongering, accusations of racism and xenophobia etc against kuip

don't fall for it

When people have their finger hovering over the ballot paper enough will think of Milliband and think 'nah'.

Holden Mcgroyne wrote:When people have their finger hovering over the ballot paper enough will think of Milliband and think 'nah'.

We will never know, of course. But I wonder how Labour would be fairing had they elected the other Milliband as leader?

My guess is that they would be doing pretty well.

Well better anyway. Although he couldn't be any worse really.

100 days of utter tedium. Can't wait

shabbado wrote:100 days of utter tedium. Can't wait

Nick Robinson on why your contempt is now shared by so many, shabs:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... INSON.html

Steve Hunt wrote:

shabbado wrote:100 days of utter tedium. Can't wait

Nick Robinson on why your contempt is now shared by so many, shabs:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... INSON.html

Tory boy Robinson isn't universally adored either.

Ralph wrote:

Steve Hunt wrote:

shabbado wrote:100 days of utter tedium. Can't wait

Nick Robinson on why your contempt is now shared by so many, shabs:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... INSON.html

Tory boy Robinson isn't universally adored either.

Examples of Tory bias in his reporting ?

Holden Mcgroyne wrote:

Ralph wrote:

Steve Hunt wrote:

shabbado wrote:100 days of utter tedium. Can't wait

Nick Robinson on why your contempt is now shared by so many, shabs:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... INSON.html

Tory boy Robinson isn't universally adored either.

Examples of Tory bias in his reporting ?

He's not just a BBC reporter he's the BBC's political editor. Seems odd that so many of their high profile staff & management are ex Conservative Party activists. It seems to be impacting on their coverage.

http://theconversation.com/hard-evidenc ... -bbc-17028

https://www.opendemocracy.net/ourbeeb/o ... d-distorti

Holden Mcgroyne wrote:

Ralph wrote:

Steve Hunt wrote:

shabbado wrote:100 days of utter tedium. Can't wait

Nick Robinson on why your contempt is now shared by so many, shabs:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... INSON.html

Tory boy Robinson isn't universally adored either.

Examples of Tory bias in his reporting ?

Hard to say, isn't it?
Unless we know differently, all we know is what he tells us. So if he, for example, leaves out some juicy negative while reporting on the Tories, we'd be none the wiser.
Not that I'm saying he has. And if he supports the Tories, I have enough trust in the BBC that he couldn't just independently fiddle what he reports. Whereas with other media, I don't think there are checks and balances on that kind of thing.
What annoys me is that when people see a reporter/presenter who they think is a "leftie" they seem to either not know or trust the oversight process.

Jeremy Paxman was always being accused by right wingers of being a BBC leftie & then as soon as he retired from Newsnight he announced he was a Tory & was approached to be the Tory candidate for London mayor.

Ralph wrote:Jeremy Paxman was always being accused by right wingers of being a BBC leftie & then as soon as he retired from Newsnight he announced he was a Tory & was approached to be the Tory candidate for London mayor.

Unfortunately the interpretation of right wing/left wing hardly translates into the traditional divide of the mainstream parties any more. They are both firmly in the centre.

Roy Twing wrote:

Ralph wrote:Jeremy Paxman was always being accused by right wingers of being a BBC leftie & then as soon as he retired from Newsnight he announced he was a Tory & was approached to be the Tory candidate for London mayor.

Unfortunately the interpretation of right wing/left wing hardly translates into the traditional divide of the mainstream parties any more. They are both firmly in the centre.

It's a tough choice between two parties for you in this election Roy. So who are you going to vote for?

UKIP or BNP?

NorthBank wrote:

Roy Twing wrote:

Ralph wrote:Jeremy Paxman was always being accused by right wingers of being a BBC leftie & then as soon as he retired from Newsnight he announced he was a Tory & was approached to be the Tory candidate for London mayor.

Unfortunately the interpretation of right wing/left wing hardly translates into the traditional divide of the mainstream parties any more. They are both firmly in the centre.

It's a tough choice between two parties for you in this election Roy. So who are you going to vote for?

UKIP or BNP?

No such tough choice for you eh, milhouse?
How many years is it before you can vote?

Roy Twing wrote:

NorthBank wrote:

Roy Twing wrote:

Ralph wrote:Jeremy Paxman was always being accused by right wingers of being a BBC leftie & then as soon as he retired from Newsnight he announced he was a Tory & was approached to be the Tory candidate for London mayor.

Unfortunately the interpretation of right wing/left wing hardly translates into the traditional divide of the mainstream parties any more. They are both firmly in the centre.

It's a tough choice between two parties for you in this election Roy. So who are you going to vote for?

UKIP or BNP?

No such tough choice for you eh, milhouse?
How many years is it before you can vote?

So UKIP then yeah?

Andy Burnham in a car-crash interview on Newsnight - shouty and ranty, avoiding questions

In summary NHS outsourcing good if Labour do it and bad if anyone else does it

He said Labour would end the market experiment (which Labour introduced) but refused to say if Labour would increase or decrease spending on outsourced NHS services

Disingenuous as 95% of services are not outsourced

White Dee endorses Labour on LBC

therealHJ wrote:Andy Burnham in a car-crash interview on Newsnight - shouty and ranty, avoiding questions

In summary NHS outsourcing good if Labour do it and bad if anyone else does it

He said Labour would end the market experiment (which Labour introduced) but refused to say if Labour would increase or decrease spending on outsourced NHS services

Disingenuous as 95% of services are not outsourced

Burnham on Newsnight, worth a view

Interesting Yougov poll

Voters Aged 18-24

Conservatives 42%
Labour 26%
Greens 23%
LibDems 7%
UKIP 2%

The lies and smears by Labour over the NHS beggar belief.

therealHJ wrote:

therealHJ wrote:Andy Burnham in a car-crash interview on Newsnight - shouty and ranty, avoiding questions

In summary NHS outsourcing good if Labour do it and bad if anyone else does it

He said Labour would end the market experiment (which Labour introduced) but refused to say if Labour would increase or decrease spending on outsourced NHS services

Disingenuous as 95% of services are not outsourced

Burnham on Newsnight, worth a view

phpBB [video]

Very entertaining, - he complains that this government is taking privatisation too far, but won't even say that his party would reduce the present figure.

And how he has the brass neck to go about "nobody gave this government permission...." after what his lot did last time on certain issues, is beyond me.

Burnham is a first clas twat, he is trying to make us believe that the 4.4% of services provided by the private sector under Labour were good but the additional 1.5% this government added is bad

As for Labour telling bare face lies, here's a leaflet on immigration about how they are going to be tough on immigration. David Lamy has just tweeted Surprised this is a Labour flyer. We're a pro-immigration party: let's not race to the bottom trying to out-kip UKIP.

Assuming that is a genuine labour leaflet, it is almost amusing that a party would consider it a feather in their cap (in the eyes of the public) to address non-english speaking public sector workers.
20 years ago, we would all have laughed at the notion that ‘frontline’ public sector staff would be employed if they couldn't speak English, - as with so many other factors, the mass immigration/multiculturalism experiment has turned the country insane.
What is even more insane is the unbelievable lack of self-awareness (or perhaps knowledge that labours voters are mostly stupid) to criticise the tories for ‘losing control of the borders’.
Unbelievable disdain for the public.