Quo Guitar
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:00 am
This is the talkFORUM archive where older posts come to have a rest.
https://archive1.talkforum.co.uk/
Let's not eh?Reg wrote:Quo.
Let's.Sid Pervcat wrote:Let's not eh?Reg wrote:Quo.
Quo.m4rkb wrote:Can't knock the Quo.
They could have been cunts. And were.AlcoholBrazil wrote:They could have been the innovators that Floyd could have been. Experimental in the 60s before they sold their
soul to The Three-Chord Devil. I like a lot of their early stuff.
The Ghost of Alex Higgins wrote:They could have been cunts. And were.AlcoholBrazil wrote:They could have been the innovators that Floyd could have been. Experimental in the 60s before they sold their
soul to The Three-Chord Devil. I like a lot of their early stuff.
finchman wrote:If you check the english oxford dic for the definition of the word Shit it says.....pop band Status Quo.
They are without doubt the biggest pile of shit ever to lift a guitar.
Pictures of matchstick men could well have been a Pink Floyd numberAlcoholBrazil wrote:They could have been the innovators that Floyd could have been. Experimental in the 60s before they sold their
soul to The Three-Chord Devil. I like a lot of their early stuff.
m4rkb wrote:Can't knock the Quo. Basic stuff well done with rhythm and a tune.
Few people can write a tune these days but a good twelve bar blues writes them for you.
delboy1983 wrote:Pictures of matchstick men could well have been a Pink Floyd numberAlcoholBrazil wrote:They could have been the innovators that Floyd could have been. Experimental in the 60s before they sold their
soul to The Three-Chord Devil. I like a lot of their early stuff.
Spot on RegRe Alc, they were never innovators and their sixties stuff was derivative shite. They were nothing like Syd's genius.
I am a massive Pink Floyd fan but Pictures of Matchstick men brought out in 1968 at that stage was as innovative as See Emily Play by Floyd.They went a different route after that touring whereas Pink Floyd went into the studioReg wrote:The Ghost of Alex Higgins wrote:They could have been cunts. And were.AlcoholBrazil wrote:They could have been the innovators that Floyd could have been. Experimental in the 60s before they sold their
soul to The Three-Chord Devil. I like a lot of their early stuff.
Re Alc, they were never innovators and their sixties stuff was derivative shite. They were nothing like Syd's genius.
Del, I love you to bits as you know, but that is absolute bollocks.delboy1983 wrote:I am a massive Pink Floyd fan but Pictures of Matchstick men brought out in 1968 at that stage was as innovative as See Emily Play by Floyd.They went a different route after that touring whereas Pink Floyd went into the studioReg wrote:The Ghost of Alex Higgins wrote:They could have been cunts. And were.AlcoholBrazil wrote:They could have been the innovators that Floyd could have been. Experimental in the 60s before they sold their
soul to The Three-Chord Devil. I like a lot of their early stuff.
Re Alc, they were never innovators and their sixties stuff was derivative shite. They were nothing like Syd's genius.