Page 1 of 2

Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:00 am
by sjbarca
phpBB [video]

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:07 am
by sjbarca
phpBB [video]

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:08 pm
by finchman
If you check the english oxford dic for the definition of the word Shit it says.....pop band Status Quo.

They are without doubt the biggest pile of shit ever to lift a guitar.

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 3:31 pm
by Reg
Quo.

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 4:28 pm
by AlcoholBrazil
They could have been the innovators that Floyd could have been. Experimental in the 60s before they sold their
soul to The Three-Chord Devil. I like a lot of their early stuff.

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 5:20 pm
by Sid Pervcat
Reg wrote:Quo.
Let's not eh? :?

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 6:02 pm
by Reg
Sid Pervcat wrote:
Reg wrote:Quo.
Let's not eh? :?
Let's. 8)












Quo.

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 6:09 pm
by Sid Pervcat
THE Quo.

Now shut up!

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 6:51 pm
by Reg
No.















QUO.

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:01 pm
by sjbarca
phpBB [video]

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:57 pm
by m4rkb
Can't knock the Quo. Basic stuff well done with rhythm and a tune.

Few people can write a tune these days but a good twelve bar blues writes them for you.

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:05 pm
by Reg
m4rkb wrote:Can't knock the Quo.
Quo.

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:21 pm
by The Ghost of Alex Higgins
AlcoholBrazil wrote:They could have been the innovators that Floyd could have been. Experimental in the 60s before they sold their
soul to The Three-Chord Devil. I like a lot of their early stuff.
They could have been cunts. And were.

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:28 pm
by Reg
The Ghost of Alex Higgins wrote:
AlcoholBrazil wrote:They could have been the innovators that Floyd could have been. Experimental in the 60s before they sold their
soul to The Three-Chord Devil. I like a lot of their early stuff.
They could have been cunts. And were.
:)

Re Alc, they were never innovators and their sixties stuff was derivative shite. They were nothing like Syd's genius.

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:43 pm
by kancutlawns
finchman wrote:If you check the english oxford dic for the definition of the word Shit it says.....pop band Status Quo.

They are without doubt the biggest pile of shit ever to lift a guitar.
:lol:

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 11:45 pm
by sjbarca
phpBB [video]

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 11:00 pm
by sjbarca
phpBB [video]

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 12:32 am
by sjbarca
phpBB [video]

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 6:58 pm
by sjbarca
Bump for Rick.

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 10:39 pm
by delboy1983
AlcoholBrazil wrote:They could have been the innovators that Floyd could have been. Experimental in the 60s before they sold their
soul to The Three-Chord Devil. I like a lot of their early stuff.
Pictures of matchstick men could well have been a Pink Floyd number

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 10:41 pm
by Petingo
m4rkb wrote:Can't knock the Quo. Basic stuff well done with rhythm and a tune.

Few people can write a tune these days but a good twelve bar blues writes them for you.

Indeed, Mark.

The musical snobs may feign disdain of the Quo but like Noddy Holder's granny at Christmas, when the Quo comes on at a wedding or whatever passes for a disco these days, they are up there rock n' rollin' with the rest.

RIP Rick......a true legend and a truly legendary band :)

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 10:44 pm
by Petingo
delboy1983 wrote:
AlcoholBrazil wrote:They could have been the innovators that Floyd could have been. Experimental in the 60s before they sold their
soul to The Three-Chord Devil. I like a lot of their early stuff.
Pictures of matchstick men could well have been a Pink Floyd number

True.

So could Black Veils of Melancholy and Ice In The Sun.

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 10:51 pm
by jet
Re Alc, they were never innovators and their sixties stuff was derivative shite. They were nothing like Syd's genius.
Spot on Reg

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 11:50 pm
by delboy1983
Reg wrote:
The Ghost of Alex Higgins wrote:
AlcoholBrazil wrote:They could have been the innovators that Floyd could have been. Experimental in the 60s before they sold their
soul to The Three-Chord Devil. I like a lot of their early stuff.
They could have been cunts. And were.
:)

Re Alc, they were never innovators and their sixties stuff was derivative shite. They were nothing like Syd's genius.
I am a massive Pink Floyd fan but Pictures of Matchstick men brought out in 1968 at that stage was as innovative as See Emily Play by Floyd.They went a different route after that touring whereas Pink Floyd went into the studio

Re: Quo Guitar

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 11:53 pm
by Reg
delboy1983 wrote:
Reg wrote:
The Ghost of Alex Higgins wrote:
AlcoholBrazil wrote:They could have been the innovators that Floyd could have been. Experimental in the 60s before they sold their
soul to The Three-Chord Devil. I like a lot of their early stuff.
They could have been cunts. And were.
:)

Re Alc, they were never innovators and their sixties stuff was derivative shite. They were nothing like Syd's genius.
I am a massive Pink Floyd fan but Pictures of Matchstick men brought out in 1968 at that stage was as innovative as See Emily Play by Floyd.They went a different route after that touring whereas Pink Floyd went into the studio
Del, I love you to bits as you know, but that is absolute bollocks. :)